Hi,

Thanks for all the feedback on this, we will look into it.

Regards,
Stuart


surgemail-list@netwinsite.com wrote:
> Same here.  The letter specifically speaks to IPv4 exhaustion in less than two years.  Other projects are 3 years, but that doesn't matter.  I would like to make 2010 the year I go production with IPv6, but that means I need to test this year...
>
> Frank
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Boyle [mailto:robert@tellurian.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 10:45 PM
> To: surgemail-list@netwinsite.com
> Subject: RE: [SurgeMail List] IPv6
>
> At 10:43 PM 4/27/2009, Abello, Vinny wrote:
>   
>> With only 12% of IPv4 address space remaining and a roughly
>> estimated 846 days left until exhaustion, I don't think it's a
>> matter of it being popular or not. :) Rather, what other addressing
>> scheme will you use that you're expecting to become more popular?
>> Although definitely not the majority, a large number of networks run
>> IPv6 today. Heck, I've had IPv6 connectivity at my home for a year
>> and half now via a 4to6 tunnel, but I'm probably a highly unusual
>> case. All the major operating systems I know of today support it
>> (some better than others). I connect to IPv6 enabled hosts
>> regularly. Just something to think about...
>>     
>
> FYI, I received a letter from ARIN today. ARIN is the IP address
> assigning authority for North America. Others deal with APNIC, LANIC,
> RIPE, or AFRINIC. Effective in May 2009, they will no longer hand out
> IPv4 address space unless your address space is 90% utilized and an
> officer of the company swears that this is the case in writing and
> they will follow up and investigate. If they find you are not
> accurate, they reserve the right to reclaim your address space. There
> isn't much IPv4 space left. I would rather be debugging Surgemail now
> as a test between users on this list than in a year or two when we
> have to because new customers don't get IPv4 addresses any more.
> However, those of us with IPv4 address space already will have enough
> addresses for our mail infrastructure, but it is just a matter of
> time before people switch to IPv6 or start NATing everything. Just
> another thought...
>
> -Robert
>
>
>
>
>   
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: SurgeMail Support [mailto:surgemail-support@netwinsite.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 8:00 PM
>>> To: surgemail-list@netwinsite.com
>>> Subject: [SurgeMail List] IPv6
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Not right now, but we will review that in the future if ipv6 ever
>>> becomes popular.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Stuart
>>>
>>> surgemail-list@netwinsite.com wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Are there any plans to make this mail server work on IPV6?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>
> Tellurian Networks - A Perot Systems Company
> http://www.tellurian.com | 888-TELLURIAN | 973-300-9211
> "Well done is better than well said." - Benjamin Franklin
>
>
>
>   

Last Next