Any news on DKIM support. It seems that yahoo is not supporting
  domainkeys anymore and more sites are supporting the DKIM and not domainkeys.
  
  Eddie W. 
  
     
     
    It's on the todo list. But not at the top of it yet :-) (so many fun
    
    things to do) 
     
    I believe both gmail and yahoo still support domainkeys which 
    surgemail already supports. Please let me know if I"m wrong in that
    
    belief :-) 
     
    Personally I find spf easier to use/configure and will generally 
    produce the same results (as it gives the receiver the same ability to
    
    trust that it is your reputation related to 
    those servers / messages, weather they decide your reputation is 
    good/bad or not is then up to them in either case) 
     
    ChrisP. 
     
     
     
    On Wednesday 08/06/2011 at 5:16 am, surgemail-list@netwinsite.com
    wrote: 
    
      "Eddie Wieder" <surgemail@planetmars.org> wrote: 
      
         
         
      Hi there, 
       
      We're looking at deploying DKIM to help delivery rates with operators
      
      like Yahoo and GMail if/when something comes up due to a customer
      
      being naughyt (usually with a forward with no spam protection).
       
      Has there been any movement on this? I reached this thread via Google
      
      and it looks like there's been nothing since March. Apologies if I
      
      just haven't found the right place 
       
      Thanks 
      Ross Halliday 
      WTC Communications 
     
     
     
    <html> 
    <head> 
    <style> 
    .sw_message P{margin:0px;padding:0px;} 
    .sw_message {FONT-SIZE:
    12pt;FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;background:white;} 
    </style> 
    </head> 
    <body class=3d"sw_message"> 
    It's on the todo list.  But not at the top of it yet :-) (so many
    fun 
    t= 
    hings to do) <div><br></div><div>I believe
    both gmail and yahoo still 
    s= 
    upport domainkeys which surgemail already supports.   Please let
    me kno= 
    w if I"m wrong in that belief
    :-) </div><div><br></div><div>Personally
    
    = 
    I find spf easier to use/configure and will generally produce the same
    resul= 
    ts (as it gives the receiver the same ability to trust that it is your
    reput= 
    ation related to</div><div>those servers / messages,
    weather they decide you= 
    r reputation is good/bad or not is then up to them in either
    case) </di= 
    v><div><br></div><div>     
    ChrisP.</div><div><br><div><br><b= 
    r><div id=3d"editor_signature"></div>On Wednesday
    08/06/2011 at 5:16 am, sur= 
    gemail-list@netwinsite.com wrote: <blockquote
    type=3d"cite">"Eddie Wieder" 
    &= 
    lt;surgemail@planetmars.org> wrote:<br><blockquote
    type=3d"cite"><br></bl= 
    ockquote>Hi there,<br><br>We're looking at deploying
    DKIM to help delivery 
    r= 
    ates with operators like Yahoo and GMail if/when something comes up due
    to 
    a= 
    customer being naughyt (usually with a forward with no spam
    protection).<br= 
    
      <br>Has there been any movement on this? I reached this thread
      via Google 
    a= 
    nd it looks like there's been nothing since March. Apologies if I just
    haven= 
    't found the right place<br><br>Thanks<br>Ross
    Halliday<br>WTC Communication= 
    s<br></blockquote><br></div></div> 
    </body></html>