Indeed a spectacular failure, something must have gone wrong,  could
you do this for me:
        ChrisP.
  Chirs, 
  Attached, also the before setting it on. 
  Looks like that the accuracy is less (maybe I interpret it wrong). 
  On the status page: 
  Neural Net Accuracy 0.0150, Bitfails 274/1389, Generation time -69 
  Steffen 
  From: Support 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 1:24 AM 
  To: surgemail-list@netwinsite.com 
  Subject: [SurgeMail List] Neural Network Beta 
  If anyone would like to beta test a slight improvement to the spam
  handling then you may wish to try one of these: 
  http://netwinsite.com/ftp/misc/v1.zip 
  http://netwinsite.com/ftp/misc/l1.tar.gz 
  (binary files, rename your existing surgemail binary first, stop
  surgemail, replace the binary, and restart) 
  Then set 
  g_sf_nnet "true" 
  then WAIT 30 MINUTES, then type in: 
  tellmail sf_compare >results.txt 
  and send me the results.txt file. Also let me know if you the spam
  detection is better/worse/different over the next 
  couple of days. 
  This setting enables a Neural Network that is trained on the sample data
  surgemail has gathered and figures out how to score messages based on the
  various features 
  it detects. In our experiments this seems to give better results than the
  existing more formal rule based system. 
  ChrisP.